Jump to content
Der Wille Zur Macht
  • Blog Statistics

    Total Blogs
    Total Entries


Featured Entries

  • Goldenforce772

    Power Rangers Gone Dark

    By Goldenforce772

    *Europe seems to be the place for emerging Power Ranger teams lately. In Northern Europe, our friends in Ninja Steel are beginning their quest to assemble the pieces necessary to establish a new Beast Morphers team. However, another new team is about to emerge in Greece. When the shards of a very evil sword known as Soul Edge fall into the hands of a certain gymnastics powerhouse, Simone Biles, she decides to take them to the famed Mount Olympus to see if they could be put to good use. She encou
  • Goldenforce772

    An Alternative Justice League Universe

    By Goldenforce772

    *While my main Golden Force Universe is on a serious hiatus period(writer's block), I have decided to delve into the vast multiverse for a world that I've always wanted to dive into. Therefore, I bring you Earth-JLU, home of a Justice League that is different from what you may have seen in the movies and/or on TV. Many of the heroes you may be familiar with are part of this alternate Justice League universe, so here's the lowdown. First, Sara Lance, America's favorite assassin, heads up this JL

Our community blogs

  1. *While my main Golden Force Universe is on a serious hiatus period(writer's block), I have decided to delve into the vast multiverse for a world that I've always wanted to dive into. Therefore, I bring you Earth-JLU, home of a Justice League that is different from what you may have seen in the movies and/or on TV. Many of the heroes you may be familiar with are part of this alternate Justice League universe, so here's the lowdown. First, Sara Lance, America's favorite assassin, heads up this JL squad in a more serious manner than she does the Legends on TV. The White Canary inherited the job of leader from Superman, who stepped down due to his commitment to defending Metropolis. She has already made a name for herself by doing away with villains such as Damien Dahrk and Ricardo Diaz. And when she's not busy saving the world, she likes to hang out in bars for some down time. Next is yours truly, the Green Lantern of Sector 2814. I inherited my ring from John Stewart, who retired to be with his family. I am also lucky enough to be dating the White Canary, and this has people noticing how well we function together. Harnessing the energy of willpower, my role in the League is to defend against cosmic threats, and in this universe, there are many. But, as Sara says, it's always important for me to remain grounded, so in my spare time, I play video games and take long walks. As for the aforementioned Superman, he and his cousin Supergirl, serve as the defenders of Metropolis and National City, respectively. These two are the great symbols of hope on this Earth, and it shows every time they fly over a crowd and the people cheer loudly for them. Supergirl's adopted sister, Alex Danvers, serves as the JL's liaison to the DEO, an organization dedicated to monitoring and tracking all possible alien threats. Then there's Dr. Ray Palmer, aka the Atom, whose expertise in miniaturization and similar forms of technology make him an invaluable member of the team. He once ran his own company, Palmertech, until an incident caused him to disappear for a while, making people believe he was dead when he really wasn't. And how can we forget about Lyla Michaels, aka the Harbinger? This mysterious woman had been in charge of a government agency known as A.R.G.U.S. for years, until it was revealed that an early encounter with a mysterious cosmic being known as the Monitor had made her much more than she was claiming to be. Next we have the familial trio of Oliver Queen, Laurel Lance and Mia Lance(Green Arrow, Black Canary and Blackstar, respectively.) This family tree got off to a rocky start decades ago after Oliver had a serious falling out with tech genius Felicity Smoak. Needless to say, Laurel saw an opportunity to comfort the Green Arrow in his time of need and it snowballed on from there. Years after Mia was born, Oliver and Laurel began to train her in the use of Oliver's signature bow and arrows. Together, these three form the conscience of the Justice League. Another interesting character in this roster is Kate Kane, aka Batwoman. Not everyone knows that she's the cousin of Bruce Wayne, aka Batman. However, this is where the connection ends. She has a way of doing things that Bruce would not approve of, such as getting in people's faces every chance she gets. Still, her style of crimefighting has kept Gotham City safe for quite some time. J'onn Jo'nzz aka the Martian Manhunter, serves as the operational heart of the League. Through him, the other members are assigned various missions throughout the globe. He is the last survivor of a Martian race that was wiped out by a civil war on his planet. Brainiac 5 hails from 1000 years in the future, when he used to serve with the galaxy-spanning Legion of Super Heroes. He is highly intelligent, although Superman does have issues with him due to the fact that Superman fought his ancestor, the original Brainiac on several occasions. Finally, that leaves Barry Allen(The Flash) and his wife Iris West. They represent the Central City portion of the League. By day, Barry works as a CSI in the Central City Police Department. But when metahuman criminals start acting up, that's when his super speed kicks into high gear as he races into action as the Fastest Man Alive. As for Iris, she serves as his support in S.T.A.R. labs. But don't worry, she's much less annoying here than she is on TV.

    That about covers the key members of this alternate reality Justice League. Expect us to get into action soon.*

  2. The Ugly Truth

    • 1
    • 12
    • 995

    Recent Entries

    Yesterday I was in Anaheim, California with my mother and we decided to join the protesters at Blizzcon. Things were going well until some Blizzard employees walked by. We mostly got nasty looks. One Blizzard employee walking by us called me a "skeezy c**t" just loud enough for me to hear, but not others. Totes rude!


    I am 16! I look 14. I don't do drugs. I don't drink. I drive safely. I get good grades. I have a job. How am I a "skeezy c**t"?


    Why doesn't Blizzard Entertainment just move to China!

  3. The only time I said anything about this whole matter was a tweet I posted in which I stated I liked the actor, but just not his character Buck. I also put a sad emoji by the last sentence because I was disappointed an actor I liked was making a joke of me. Regardless of his intent, he came across that way.




    I actually got a tweet from the actor who plays Buck. I wasn't really paying attention to alot of tweet's. I caught my friend @Retra_Alice_U's  tweet defending me. Some I ignored. Some people I had to block because they were targeting me very abusively. So I never saw the tweet that was deleted.



    Because of the character Buck's behavior in regarding him wanting to sue the city, fire department, and Bobby... I began to detest him. THE CHARACTER, not the actor. I began to voice it. Others did as well. A few people chose to harass and threaten me just because I started to not like Buck (character not the actor). Much of it was in DM on Twitter. I figured it would all die down eventually if I just kept blocking people posting nasty tweets and sending nasty messages. A few people accused me of "Hating on Oliver" just because at that time I didn't like Buck. While I do have autism, I am not stupid. I know the difference between ACTOR and CHARACTER. It's possible to like an actor, but dislike one of his/her characters. But yet some people will still falsely accuse someone of hating on the actor, because someone dislikes a character.



    Not long ago I noticed this. While I have shown distaste for Buck (not the actor), I never once said the character Buck or the actor Oliver should be written off the show. Not once have I said a bad word about the actor, Oliver Stark. What I said in the tweet shown above would in no way come close to bad mouthing him.


    After this tweet was posted I received many nasty DMs on Twitter. I lost count after 85. But yet I go about my business. Why... because I don't let anyone run my life via their actions and/or words.



    Of all the Buck fanatics that chose to viciously attack me, only one DMed me pleasantly. I almost missed that DM because I have been reporting and blocking those sending me nasty messages. This person didn't want to be named, so I will respect their request. They don't me they took a thorough look at my tweets and noticed I was telling the truth when I mentioned I liked Buck alot up until he decided to sue the city, fire department, and Bobby. He even pointed out some tweets he found. Then I was asked "Do you think you will like Buck again?". All I said was "It's possible" I started to not like him for a reason and if that reason goes away... who knows?". One thing many people fail to realize is with TV characters that there will be times we love them and times we  hate them or want them  (The characters not the actors) to rot or burn in Hell. Just because someone dislikes a character now, doesn't mean they will dislike them forever.



    Another thing. Just because someone expresses alot of dislike about a character, does not mean they want them off the show or they think it is a "bad character". Yes, I dislike Buck ALOT right now. No I don't think he should be off the show. He's a good character on the show. He's been loved. He's been hated. He's been pitied. Some have cried for him. He's (Buck) brought out all of the emotions. That makes a character interesting. Just because I dislike Buck, doesn't mean I don't find him interesting.



    Above I spoke of the fact that I liked Buck up to a certain point. Which, to be exact, was towards the end of the episode of 9-1-1 on October 14, 2019. Below I shall show some tweets, old and new, showing and proving that up until October 14, 2019 I adored Buck.


















    The above tweets are just a small handful of pro-Buck tweets on my profile prior to when I began to dislike him (the character, not the actor). If any of those who targeted me for harassment and sent me threatening messages had bothered to check they would have seen them and more. Those with common sense and decency would see that...

    1) I adored Buck up until a certain point.

    2) I never said that Buck should be off the show.

    3) Based on tweets prior to disliking Buck and why I started disliking him...that it's possible I'll start liking him again after some time of him not doing what he did for me to dislike him. Speaking about the character, not the actor.

    Alot of people chose to attack first. Without looking into anything. Some people lied to infuriate some Buck fans so there would be more attacking me. Some went as far as creating fake tweets, posting pics of them just to justify their vicious attacks. Attacking someone because they don't like a character or criticize it is not only immature, but also bullying.



    I am in no way saying all Buck fans are bad people or bullies. Just the ones attacking people over their opinion of the character. I never said Buck should be written off the 9-1-1 show and other things claimed that I said (that I didn't). I know the truth. I and those close to me know I never said what's been claimed about me and that is enough for me.

    • 1
    • 16
    • 50

    Recent Entries

    Tonight SA was enjoying a new episode of Law And Order: Special Victims Unit. She made a simple statement of what the episode is about. It centers on abortion. A 13 year old girl named Evangeline runs away from home to go to New York City to get an abortion because she was raped by her step father. BT1960 took it upon herself to attack SA over the simple statement of what the episode centered around.




    I took it upon myself to defend SA. I feel like I was justified. BT1960 replied to me claiming she doesn't judge anyone and says I shouldn't judge her. But what did she do to SA just over stating what an episode was about? She put herself in a position to be judged when she took it upon herself to attack without thinking.


    I flat out told her she lacked integrity if she didn't delete her tweet and apologize. I meant it and I stand by it. How BT1960 came at SA attacking her was uncalled for. Especially when SA was stating what a tv show episode centered around.



    If you look at the bio of BT1960, you will see it says "Football nerd/Catholic/ND Fan/Cubs Fan  My own girl/Sarcastic Smartass/#MeToo/Sexual Assault Survivor and Advocate". She claims to be a sexual assault survivor, but attacks one online. All over SA stating what the Law and Order SVU episode was about.




    The very behavior of this woman puts her in a very bad position to be judged very poorly due to her own actions.


    She puts herself in a position to be judged

    1) and asked if she really is a sexual assault victim/survivor and advocate. I am in no way saying she is not. I am just saying she puts herself in a position to be questioned if she really is because

    ----------A) she attacks another sexual assault survivor.

    ----------B) she blindly attacks SA telling her she has no right to comment in response to her (SA) tweet over what an episode  of Law and Order SVU centered around.

    ----------C) shouldn't victim advocates exercise patience and not fly off the handle over something as simple as stating what a TV show episode is about?

    2) she claims she doesn't judge anyone, but yet she harshly judged SA over stating what a TV show episode centered upon.

    3) attacked SA out of the blue.

    4) she tried to play herself off as a victim in this when she was clearly the aggressor.

    5) as petty and childish. While I believe people have a right to block someone on social media, the reason BT1960 blocked me was because

    ----------A) she knew I was right about her behavior and wanted to try and avoid incriminating herself and/or

    ----------B) she knew she was wrong in how she approached SA and wanted to hide from it so she could play the victim in this and/or

    ----------C) she can't handle anyone simply calling out her bad behavior.



    If BT1960 attempts to say any of the above was altered /photoshopped or deletes the tweets and tries to act as if what she said never took place................I have proof that can't be denied.

    PROOF: http://archive.is/4Fkiw



    BT1960 behaved very poorly at the end of last night. Based on her actions and what she proclaims to be, I have every right to call her a hypocrite. She also behaved liked a bully. In closing I will say this, BT1960 needs to learn to look before she leaps and try to be more respectful to others.

    • 2
    • 90
    • 2718

    Recent Entries

    Late on Sunday October 14, 2019, I was enjoying a friend ("PersonA") of mine's tweets regarding the show 9-1-1. There was a short period of time when she stopped tweeting. I assumed she was tending to her pet. I then notice someone ("PersonB") had sent her a rather nasty tweet regarding a tweet she made about a character ("CharacterA") upon the show. "PersonB" had referred to her as "r**a*ded" and she should have been aborted. I refreshed the screen after walking my dog. I noticed that the actor ("ActorA") of "CharacterA" had responded to "PersonB's" tweet  regarding "PersonA's" tweet about "CharacterA". "ActorA's" response  was 3 laughing smilies. It sickened me that "ActorA" thought it was funny that "PersonB" called "PersonA" a r**a*d that should have been aborted. I was getting ready to report the converasation, but I end up with an error. Sure enough "PersonB" and "ActorA" deleted their tweets. So, evidence of this attack was completely gone. I thought, perhaps, maybe they both realize what they did and deleted because they knew they were wrong. I highly doubt "PersonA" even saw it. So I decided to let it go as I watched the Twitter pages for "ActorA" and "PersonB".



    A small bit later I noticed that "PersonB" quoted a tweet by "PersonA" while tagging "ActorA". "PersonB" was telling "ActorA" that "PersonA" was dissing him.  "ActorA" responded in a way that gave the impression he thought "PersonB" was being funny. There is nothing funny about attacking another or trying to get someone attacked. "PersonB" came across strongly as he was hoping fans of "ActorA" and his character ("CharacterA") would attack "PersonB" over their opinion of a TV show character. In no way was "PersonA" attacking "ActorA".


    Had "ActorA" not put the laughing smiley after "Bit harsh". I would have assumed "ActorA" was defending "PersonA" to "PersonB". But here it impresses that "ActorA" thinks "PersonB" is funny".



    I had responded to the tweet by "ActorA". Almost immediately, he had deleted his tweet.


    At first I thought maybe "ActorA" realized how it came across. Then I remembered how he had deleted his laughing smilies to the horrible tweet "PersonB" sent "PersonA" earlier, in which he told "PersonA" she was r**a*ded and should have been aborted. Part of me wanted to bring that up, but part of me thought it was a bad idea considering both "PersonB" and "ActorA" deleted those tweets and erased evidence it ever took place.



    "PersonB" took it upon himself to approach me in an attacking manner. Had it not been for the first sentence, I would have simply responded to him informing him that regardless of intent, he came across a particular way.


    Behavior by "PersonB" after this tweet strongly indicates that he was feeding me a line of bullsh*t here. Part of me wanted to bring up the actual initial interaction I witnessed between him an "ActorA"



    "PersonB" took it upon himself to take to his Twitter page to complain about the matter in a way that implies he is attempting to play the victim card. One person's ("PersonD") response makes it clear as to why "PersonB" has selectively deleted some tweets and is attempting to make himself to be the victim. So that way others coming upon his plight, would  be more likely to believe however he chooses to portray the matter.


    A few people ("PersonC", "PersonD", and "PersonE") took it upon themselves to coddle this rather childish behavior.



    "PersonA" thanked me for defending her. To which, "ActorA" had responded. My response was simple and asking that he understand that making light of an attack on another is never okay.


    Part of me had wanted to tell him off and point out that using laughing emojis with sarcasm to an attack on another is nowhere near an apology. But because he had deleted his tweet, that he had claimed was an apology, onlookers might take a brief look at the above and get the impression that "ActorA" is being targeted. I doubt this was his intent, but he does need to be careful how he comes across.



    With this tweet, and how it was worded, it indicates that "PersonB's" intent was to act as if I was "after" him in some manner. In the above tweet I had shown, I was merely making a point to "ActorA". I was not rambling on like a spoiled child.


    "PersonE", whom was one of those whom only saw what "PersonB" wanted them to see, decided to back up "PersonB" in his fabricated claim that what he said was not an attack.



    At first, I thought this was purely an innocent bystander chiming in based on purely what wasn't deleted by "ActorA" and "PersonB". Which made the matter look different. But what disturbs me is how she downplays "ActorA's" laughing at the attack on "PersonA". That "ActorA" making light of an attack on "PersonA" was rude and uncalled for. Hardly light hearted. I did not want to respond saying such and chalked it up to this person being a devoted fan of "ActorA's"  "CharacterA" . Often times devoted fans have a hard time as seeing their idol as less than flawless.


    I thought I would leave "PersonF" to their thoughts. One of the reasons I am showing this tweet is due further communication from this individual after this.



    A few thoughts did pop into my mind. If "ActorA" was truly laughing at people's reactions to his charter's ("CharacterA") reaction, then why didn't he respond to "PersonA's" tweet directly? First she says "PersonB's" tweet was not an attack. But in speaking about "ActorA", she indirectly refers to "PersonB's" tweet as an attack.


    As I have previously stated, the way "ActorA" responded was very indicative of him praising "PersonB's" attack upon "PersonA". This one is coming across as one of those devoted fan types as I mention regarding the previous tweet.



    "PersonB" overdramatizing upon his Twitter timeline. Highly likely due to the drama he started and had stirred.


    Being he had used the hashtag for the show 9-1-1, perhaps he was hoping for a few onlookers upon his timeline and others to be on his side regarding the trouble he had stirred.



    This is the Twitter DM I had received from "PersonF". Apparently, and likely, due to lack of engagement with her borderline trolling, she took it upon herself to attack me. She uses the fact we differ in political beliefs to excuse the behavior of "PersonB" and "ActorA". I would hardly call "ActorA" making light of an attack by "PersonB" upon "PersonA" harmless engagement.



    At this point, I had decided to block this individual. I would have before, but I do not block over devoted fan behavior. Attacks, yes.



    I will admit that I did report "PersonB"on Twitter. The explanation I gave was "an attack upon an individual with the intent to cause further harm in hopes others would attack as well". I did not think Twitter would react so quickly. But I am glad that they had.


    Hopefully "PersonB" will cool off and stop targeting people whom are not fans of "CharacterA".



    Another person ("PersonG") approaches me and defends "PersonB" acting as if he did no wrong. Also, in defense of "ActorA" making light of an attack on "PersonA" by "PersonB".Always the tool of the troll is to call someone delusional and lie with a claim of arguing too much.


    Highly likely this person is a random fanboy of "CharacterA". A rather hyper one twisting the situation to make "ActorA" out to be some helpless victim.


    I am completely disgusted with "ActorA". Mostly because what he claims to have been an apology, was him making light of an attack by "PersonB" upon "PersonA". Also because he claims he was asking "that not to happen". In no way did he do so. If what he erased was what he said, why delete it?


    I have come to notice that when it comes to "CharacterA" a wide majority (not all, but alot) of his fans will attack those whom are not fans of "CharacterA", even if they are fans of "ActorA", whom plays "CharacterA". If I chose to post everything, or even half, of attacks on non-fans of "CharacterA", I would be writing this blog until Christmas.


    Why do the actors not do or say anything about their fans attacking non fans? By doing nothing and saying nothing, they are enabling this horrendous behavior and putting forth the image that they're okay with it. I am in no way saying any actor should confront a bully or a troll. What I am saying is a generalized statement stating something is not okay, can go a long way. Also by doing and saying nothing, the "rabid fans" continue to attack non-fans under the belief that the actor is okay with such behavior. And, in a way, this is a form of censorship which implies "If you do not like my character, I'll sit back and watch my fans attack you until you do.".



    Update#1: 1:30am ET on 10/21/2019:  https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/82-toxicity-within-fanbases-9-1-1/?do=findComment&comment=685

    Update#2: 7:48pm ET on 10/23/2019: https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/82-toxicity-within-fanbases-9-1-1/page/3/?tab=comments#comment-699

    Update#3: 9:38pm ET on 10/23/2019: https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/82-toxicity-within-fanbases-9-1-1/?do=findComment&comment=700

    • 1
    • 7
    • 10

    Recent Entries

    When I first joined Twitter, I created the account name "@MandyBaby40". It wasn't long before my account was hacked and taken by some teen. Or hacked by a friend of hers and given to her. I was like "f**k it" and just stayed away from Twitter.


    Eventually I made a new Twitter. I had all but forgotten about everything until, by chance, I came upon a tweet from my original account that was stolen. Every so often I would report that account to Twitter. I lost track of how many times I did. Eventually I stopped. But,later On I came upon this tweet.


    Whoa and behold, the person that stole my original account lost it and created a new one. Not a smart move to whine about Twitter deleting an account you stole because you out yourself as the one who had it stolen. I tried to change my name to my original. I got back an error that the name wasn't available. I checked and my stolen account was gone. Apparently Twitter did delete it. Thank goodness on that because people who steal accounts should not be allowed to keep them. I contacted Twitter and actually got a non-generic response. I got a long speech about how when an account is deleted, it takes awhile for the name to be "released" and allowed to use again.


    So I kept trying each day I logged on to Twitter. Just as Sunday October 13 came to a close, I was able to claim my old name back.


    In a way it feels like justice was served. The person that stole my original account lost it. I was able to eventually use "MandyBaby40" again.

    • 1
    • 6
    • 11

    Recent Entries

    At my high school, we have metal detectors. We have to empty our pockets, backpacks, and purses. We get searched too. Everything gets checked. With school shootings becoming common, it is understandable. But to what extent? How far is too far?


    When my friend Brooke was being checked, one of the school security officers took it upon herself to read parts of her journal with a fellow officer beside her. She got chastised for saying she loved seeing the 3 From Hell movie with her Foster mother. She was told, infront of nearby students, that she has a sick mind to enjoy watching people being brutally murdered. Those nearby, not seeing her journal, but overheating that jerk of a security officer, teased and bullied her for the next week by calling her a future school shooter!


    One time when going to school, a male security officer held up tampons that he found in my backpack. He made a very cray cray comment Saying tampons imply that I am sexually free!


    One kid got escorted to the principal's office and suspended for 2 days because a security officer found a picture of He-man holding a sword up high. It was deemed a potential threat.


    I am all for school safety. But I think school security should stop humiliating us high schoolers of petty bullsh*t and stick to doing their jobs!

    • 1
    • 78
    • 2534

    Recent Entries

    Two days ago I had a Twitter DM conversation with a man that blocked my friend M---y. I thought it was accidental. It happens. It turned out to be anything but. The entire DM conversation is below. Due to the no "naming and shaming" rule, I have blotched out names, personal photos, and chat identities. I have confirmed with 3 admins that all that is shown below is authentic.



    I approached this person believing the blocking of my friend @s-----------0 (M---y) was accidental. Then @i--c---------r tells me he received "very very" disturbing message that my friend M---y had written. He says that in them M---y was bullying his friend L---a. I have known M---y for a long time. She is kind, sweet, patient, understanding and would never bully or be hurtful to anyone. This man @i--c---------r is friends with the same people spoken of here: https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/52-my-own-bullying-experience-part-2/, minus the woman with the autistic kid. She has no association with this man or his actions. I knew this and M---y knew this, but she didn't want to judge him based on a few of his friends being bullies. It is obvious who passed on the lied about M----y to him.





    It is quite obvious that @i--c---------r chose to believes those lies that were sent to him. Not once did he attempt to try and talk to M---y.
    Not once did he stop and think about any of the following.
    1. All the pleasant interactions he and M---y had.
    2. All the nice interactions on M---y's twitter timeline.
    3. How respectful and understand M---y has been with him and others.
    4. All the attacks on the timelines of those he is friends with that have stalked, harassed, and bullied M---y.
    @i--c---------r just chose to blindly believe these people who are frequently nasty to others. These same people who will turn against those who won't turn a blind eye and outlive their use.

    The way @i--c---------r responds to me is very telling. It's a "it's no big deal" impression. Considering the claims he was making, odd isn't it.





    I offer @i--c---------r the blog my friend M---y wrote regarding the people that turned against her unjustly and have been bullying, stalking, and harassing her. He, very easily, brushes it off. She never talked about its contents after posting it.
    Then @i--c---------r claims to have proof M---y was using a parody account to attack and bully others. Not once did @i--c---------r offer up this so called proof he said he had.

    I made a point to @i--c---------r about @e----m raging about that blog on her Twitter timeline. Considering no names were mentioned in that blog, what does it show besides guilt.





    I continue to make my point to @i--c---------r about how these friends of his have abused M---y. I point out he turns a blind eye to attacks on others via their own Twitter timelines.

    Right after I make my good and valid point, @i--c---------r decides to say he was given the IP address of M---y's computer. I continue to defend her saying she'd never attack anyone.





    I continue to defend my friend M---y. This @i--c---------r claims to have "irrefutable proof!". Not once did he offer anything up to prove his claims. He didn't even try to send me what he was sent that made M---y look so bad. He just gets annoyed that I don't sway his way on the claims. To me, this is very fishy.





    Here, @i--c---------r acknowledges that M---y had been nice to him. One plus for him. Atleast he acknowledged that. I then tell him that it is possible to forge a computer IP address. People can lie about it. People can photoshop screenshots taken. People can have their friends back up their lies. People can forge the data, pass it off to a few who ask very few questions so they have some back up. Strength in numbers.

    It seems that @i--c---------r is acknowledging that IP addresses can be forged. Just right after he claims they can't be. Now, which is it?





    I make a point to @i--c---------r that he was given false data. I also make a point how M---y is a good person and has shown she's a good person, but he chooses to believe different without questioning it.
    Then @i--c---------r tries to get the subject changed by saying he had his life hacked, but I chose to stay on topic. But I chose to stay on topic and point out how he is defaming M---y's character.

    Generally speaking, when someone tries to suddenly change the subject, it is because their BSing is showing, might show, and/or is getting them nowhere.





    After my point about how he is defaming M---y's character, @i--c---------r claims he had it researched by a private investigator. I make good points and he is now getting very "cagey" as he makes a bold claim.





    Then @i--c---------r says he hired a private investigator with his own money to "check out all these sick people". Wait a minute, I thought he said M---y was responsible. But he hires a PI to check out "all these sick people". Someone's story is changing a little.
    I point out how his friends target M---y and others and that he turns a blind eye. His response was saying he's not passing on a word of this as if he is doing M---y or me a favor.
    So, @i--c---------r allegedly hired a PI to check out these messages he was shown. He claims he got M---y's computer IP address from this PI. He says he had this PI "check out these sick people", when he had claimed only M---y before. A PI can't legally obtain a computer's physical address from these claimed messages unless law enforcement or an ISP got involved and obtained it.

    I guess what I am saying is, @i--c---------r is lying. My guess is he is hoping I will pass on what he said to M----y so she will get scared and slink away from social media, like his bullying friends have been trying to do to her. 





    I point out, again, to @i--c---------r that he believes lies about M---y, a good person. Then I point out how he says nothing about his friends' attacks on others. Then I point out that he is an accessory to their bullying, threats, and stalking because he sees it and does nothing.

    Then @i--c---------r gets very defensive acting like I am judging him. All I did was make a few points. Then he says he is a grown man and can do what he wants. So he is saying if he wants to lie, pass on lies, or defame someone that it is okay.




    These "friends" of @i--c---------r that I spoke of that have bullied, stalked, and harassed M---y, are the ones blogged about here: https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/52-my-own-bullying-experience-part-2/
    They are that disbarred lawyer and her friends.
    @i--c---------r has been lied to. He has chosen to run with these lies and blindly believe what he was shown. Based upon his actions and behavior in our conversation, I firmly believe he was lying about hiring a PI.
    1. Why would someone be paying alot of money for a PI to get someone's "computer IP address", only to do nothing with it?
    2. A PI can't legally obtain someone's physical computer address without involvement of an ISP and/or law enforcement. No ISP or Law Enforcement agency will go about obtaining that information unless a crime has been committed in which they are prosecuting for.
    3. Not once was any type of proof offered.
    4. First he claims M---y is responsible. Then he says he hired a PI to check out "these sick people", implying more than one. Story change.
    5. He tries to get the subject changed as I make valid points.
    6. He gets cagey as I make valid points.

    7. Showed agitation when I wouldn't sway his way on his defamation about M---y and continued to stand up for her and have her back.

    • 0
    • 0
    • 151

    No blog entries yet

    • 1
    • 10
    • 264

    Recent Entries

    It all started with a simple tweet. The tweet in question has been archived at this location.


    My response was to merely point out her behavior was that of a grammar nazi since there is obviously nothing wrong with a compliment.



    This woman's response was rather abrasive and uncalled for.





    Then she proceeds to attack someone that liked and retweeted my tweet.



    Next she proceeds to attack the producer of the show The Rookie for liking my tweet. She jumps all over him him referring to me and anyone liking or retweeting my tweet as harassing her. She proceeds to tell him he should go unlike it.



    It does not stop there. Now this woman is going on implying I, and anyone liking or retweeting my tweet is a transphobe.




    I only gave one response to the conversation. She was behaving like a grammar nazi over a simple compliment someone gave her. All I did was point that out. I left it at that. Now over that I and anyone whom has liked or retweeted my tweet is being implied as transphobic. 2 people were even attacked over just liking my tweet.


    She carried on. She has chosen to try and twist this into something it is not. In no way was anything I or the original tweeter said, transphobic. There is nothing transphobic about anyone who chose to like or retweet my tweet.


    While this woman is attempting to portray herself as a victim, she needs to think about all of whom are transgender who get assaulted, beaten, raped, and even murdered just for being transgender. They are victims. She is not. How she behaved to tonight is shameful and disgraceful to he LGBT community and the rights they fight for each and every day.

  4. *So here I was, minding my own business when Samus informs me of the massive layoffs that just went on over at Activision Blizzard. You remember them, don't you? The antagonists of FOREVER GOLDEN, and the ones whose guild masters and other GMs chased a lot of us out. Well, first, let me start this off by saying I feel for those who got a layoff. Maybe they'll get jobs in places where the companies will appreciate them more than Blizzard ever did. Blizzard only cares about two things: money and maintaining a bully-friendly environment. Let me remind all the new people reading this why yours truly, Samus and the more experienced people hate that company: in 2011, a creep named Andrew Rotramel conspired to force us out by any means necessary after Zenon exposed him for the rat he is. He started with Stargirl, who was the victim of a gold selling scam. Then it snowballed to the rest of us to the point where we left that hideous world of Azeroth on May 5, 2011. After some time, a lot of us settled in the far superior world of Norrath(EQ2) where we continue to hang our hats. However, from the stories I've been hearing, the nightmares wrought by Blizzard did not end with our departure. In fact, they got worse. And with each expansion released, the stories of people quitting in droves continued to come out. And now, this sick, twisted company wants to tell people that their games are going along fine in spite of the fact that they just layed off hundreds of people. That's hundreds of human beings with livelihoods that have now been put on hold. People want to say that EA is the worst gaming company on the planet. Maybe. Their sports games aren't what they used to be. But you don't see EA pulling the kind of crap we're now seeing with Blizzard. It's been almost 8 years since we walked out of WOW. I have never been happier that we did, especially in light of today's news.

    • 1
    • 9
    • 234

    Recent Entries

    *We start off this blog by talking about ECW's most bloodthirsty feud: Gaby Lozoya vs. Susana Almeida. These two Mexican weather superstars have been vying for the hearts of their male audiences for years. From the weather studio to the wrestling ring, these two have been exciting their audience to a fever pitch. So during the relaunch of ECW late last year, it was decided that the two of them would share control of their brand's NWO faction. But there's a reason why the word "diva" applies to these two women. There was no way these two superstars would settle for sharing power. One had to dominate over the other, and therefore, for the last several weeks, they have been attacking each other to see who was better. The advantage so far has gone to Gaby Lozoya, whose moveset was modeled after the late Eddie Guerrero. But that doesn't mean Susana doesn't have a few tricks up her sleeve. Still, the battle continues to see which one is the dominant weather girl in the ring, and I, for one, look forward to seeing the results of this.*

    • 1
    • 19
    • 172

    Recent Entries

    I started playing World of Warcraft nearly 3 years ago on my 15th birthday. At first, I thought it was a great game. It was rich in storylines with a wealth of activities to do.


    My grades always stayed good. I studied.  I didn't have to work. Parents for for everything within reason and as long as my grades are good. But pretty soon, World of Warcraft was all I did in my spare time. If I wasn't doing homework or household chores, it was always World Of Warcraft. It wasn't that way at first.


    As I advanced in levels the pressure was on to reach "max level" and get into end game content and do raids. So I was spending more and more time working on getting my levels higher to reach that maximum level. Once I did, the pressure was on to be "geared", have the the best of the best. While I enjoyed the game, I wasn't about to put it ahead of my studies or my family.


    I thought that as long as my family and school work came first, then it there would be no problems. I enjoyed playing and doing raids. The guild I was with had a schedule that fit with mine perfectly. I couldn't ask for better, right? One day I was suppose to raid, I skipped it. I informed the guild leader I needed to skip it so I could finish my science project on electricity. I thought things were fine. The next time I was at a raid, I got kicked out at the last moment and ended up with nothing. I asked why and the guild leader said I shouldn't skip out on raids. Then I got a speech about priorities and I will never get anywhere if I don't learn to put my priorities straight. I thought that was the end of it. Then I saw a post on the guild forums saying I was banned from attending raids until I learn to get my priorities in order. I posted a lengthy response. I mentioned my age and I was upfront about it form the start and that my studies and school work came first becuse getting an education is what will help me support myself after I leave home. Better education, better job, more money. The response I got back was made me rethink my time in World of Warcraft. The guild leader accused me of attacking his policies and said an extra 2-3 hours to help the guild wouldn't kill me. A few people stood up for me saying that me putting my education first was admirable. One person said "So you want him to put aside his school work for the guild one time. You told me that 2 years ago. That one time turned to many and I've had to rearrange my life around the guild needs. f**k you no longer. Grow up.". People left the guild. The guild leader blamed me for his guild starting to fall apart.


    I left my guild and tried to search for another. I got in one, but was kicked shortly after because apparently my last guild leader claimed I stole everything from the guild bank. It seems he made a toon with a name close to mine and took a bunch of stuff out. He did the same to other guild members. I will always regret every joining the Champions of Light guild on the Whisperwind server.


    I ended up changing servers. I found what I thought was a good guild. I thought so until I was expected to be on more than I could be. I was pushed and pressure to "come on for a few" to help out new guildies. Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against helping new players, but I am against putting some game before things in real life. I got chastised by people for not being on one night to help out because I went to a movie. I explained that once in awhile I deserve to do something for myself considering how hard I work to do well in school. I got a lecture about how movies are entertainment and not a necessity. I fired back with saying World of Warcraft is the same thing and I wanted a little diversity in my activities so I don't get burned out. a large number of people jumped all over me. I got a long speech about priorities and how I should put my guild's needs before my own. I was like "So these people expect me to not go out or spend time with the few friends I have just for their bits and bytes on a computer game?". This was the final straw.


    While most people rage quit, I simply logged out and stopped getting time cards.  I felt relieved. While I was working on some calculus homework one day, I began to think of so much I missed out on by putting so much time to that game. Despite that school work and family and friends were #1, I still missed out on alot. I got a job at Burger King that I still enjoy. I'm helping my parents out with the bills and saving for college. I didn't think of World of Warcraft again until after 2 weeks that I quit. I started to get angry messages on Facebook asking why I've been shirking my responsibilities for the guild. I was referred to as selfish. I was told I was just as bad as some death knight named "Dfanning" that left years ago in 201. I blocked each and every one of those people. The guild that was doing this to me was some guild on the Anvilmar server. I don't remember the name of the guild, but it had the word "Shadows" in its name.


    Now that I have washed my hands of World of Warcraft, I feel like I have escaped a cult.

  5. Luke Jimenez (HOME: Savini Residence)
    When I first started out, I chose Breakdown level 1 and to start as a random non-hero character. I was "Luke Jimenez". 2 zombies cam at me from the getgo. Once I defeated them, I checked the map to see what was available for communities to start in. I had 3 options: McReady Farmhouse, Kirkman Residence, and the Savini Residence.


    I chose to bunk up at the Savini residence with the survivors there. Not even a moment later, Quentin called out over the radio asking for an escort. As I got in my truck I chose to fix up: bedroom, kitchen, and library. I headed to where Quentin was and saved him from the zombies. But he ran off. Prsumably to wherever he was staying. Then I went in an office building  to check this pile of stuff and a box, which tends to yield bundles of materials. I was right. It paid off.


    Right as I was headed back to home, something popped up about a besieged. It was at the house across from where I was staying. After that I decided to set up a medical area at home. Now it was time to go home, get some supplies and do a besieged. There was really nothing wiorth while to use for the beseiged, so I just decided to head over there. I spoke to Marcus Campbell and agreed to help him with the besieged. Luckily it went well.


    After the besieged, I checked the map. I had a "facility need". So it was time to get some serious work done. I had to find some cotton swabs. I went to the little shed on the map that was pointed out. I didn't find them there, but I found some medical supplies. I then headed on over to this one warehouse, I wanted to turn into an outpost. I found a couple bundles of materials there and the cotton swabs I needed in order to finish building a small medical facility at home base. I mad sure to wait on the collection of one undle of materials so that when I set up an outpost, I would sort of have a little bonus to materials. I think it means I lose less each day to help maintain the community. Once i was done there, I headed to the mini mart near the Snyder Trucking Warehouse. I gathered some bundles of food and turned it into an outpost. Upon finishing there I headed home. I put the truck in a parking space. The community automatically collected the supplies I gathered. now it was time to give Luke Jimenez a rest because he was now listed as hurt.



    Myles Hoyt (HOME: Savini Residence)
    Now it was time to give Myles Hoyt a chance. Well I didn't have any other choice, but hopefully he will be of some use. the first thing I did was go to help these two sruvivors that needed help: Jaiden Archer and Becca Collins. After I helped them kill the zombies swarming them, I searched that barn. I found some food supplies and materials supplies. We then got in the minivan I stole and began to head to home.


    As I was heading home, I got to thinking, why not put these two to good use and have them along as I gathered more supplies. My first stop was the downtown Marshal police department. I completely looted that place of its weapon and ammo. After that, I took us to the gas stations across from the Snyder Trucking Warehouse. I found some fuel supplies and food supplies. Good fortune indeed. I immediately went home. I dumped what I had in the supply locker and switched to Jaiden Archer.



    Jaiden Archer (HOME: Savini Residence)
    Upon switching to Jaiden Archer, my game saved. Since I am tired, I have decided to log out and get some sleep. I shall resume later and see what Jaiden has to offer then.


    Screenshots from my "State Of Decay: Breakdown" game play so far:


  • Create New...