Jump to content
Der Wille Zur Macht
  • Welcome!

    Welcome.

    If you are a member, please sign in.

    If you are not a member, feel free to sign up.

    Anyone is welcome.

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 08/16/2019 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    Jail time. 3 years for each pet abandoned during a disaster that presents significant risk to life.
  2. 3 points
    This blog is a follow up to: "My Own Bullying Experience". The only bullies that won't be mentioned are ones in which there have been no changes since the last blog. The woman with the autistic child While she has done ALOT in the past, as of now, she has left me alone. She's improved a bit in how she treats others and how she is over all. I hope she continues to do so. If she does, she can be the type of person people would love to know and have as a friend. I think a large part of what made her how she was, was this group of older ladies (our age and older) persistently going after her at the direction of the one they all listened to... this woman whom was once an attorney, but disbarred. Being that this woman has owned her part in what she has done, that means there is hope. Group of older ladies & their CLOSE male friends, often directed by disbarred attorney. In my last blog I spoke of this group of older ladies and some guys they had in their little circle. The main person (female) at the center of this was a woman I thought I knew. She was often accused of being this Disbarred Attorney that's been posted about on multiple sites. One of them being the same site I was unjustly posted on by the one whom I referred to as the "bully blogger" in my prior blog. So that is part of the reason why I did not believe she was this Disbarred Attorney. I figured since I, and others, were lied about, that she was lied about as well. Sadly the Disbarred Attorney is one of very few wasn't lied about. A vast majority of what the Bully Blogger has said about her IS true. Another site Disbarred Attorney is on is one created by this man whom claims to be antibully and has bought a ".com" in her name. There was someone else that had an entire blog site about her and stuff she has done. But I had forgotten where it is. For the longest time I did not want to believe that this woman I had befriends was this Disbarred Attorney. The largest reason I did not was because the same people accusing her of being her were rather abusive and cruel towards me. What reason did I have to even believe them? Why believe people that were persistently attacking me, lying about me, stalking me, threatening me, and trying to get others after me? What ultimately lead me to the conclusion that this woman WAS in fact Disbarred Attorney was certain behaviors or hers matched claims made by multiple people that had no connection to each others. That and one say when she was complaining and making false claims about me, there were ALOT of IPs from the same place where her husband practices law and she use to that were looking my my forums. Particularly all over my "My Own Bullying Experience" blog. Basically a combination of things. But I will get into that in a moment. That and give a more detailed account of what she and her closest friends have pulled on me. In relation to claims made about her and their behavior. It's been claimed that Disbarred Attorney and her friends "attack people's jobs". A few have even said they attack where people live as in file false complaints to get them kicked out. One things Disbarred Attorney and her friends love to do is bother those known to their victims whether it be friends, family, co-workers, or acquaintences. A friend of Disbarred Attorney has even called the job of one woman, who works at a law firm, to try to get her fired. The better way to handle it instead of ranting and raging, would have been to file a complaint. When someone calls ranting and raging, who wants to listen to them? It makes THEM look like the problem even if they have a legit complaint. Disbarred Attorney, along with that one friend of hers that lives in the UK, have actively and persistently tried to find out where the woman with the autistic child works. While that woman is guilty of alot, NO ONE deserves to be harassed on the job. Since Disbarred Attorney and her friends can't cost em a job I don't have and a home I 100% own, they've resorted to other ways to try to interfere in my life beyond online. One of the ways is they attempted to get me banned from a local movie theatre. Unfortunately for them, but fortunately for me, it failed in a major way. I produced proof of threats made against me. The type of proof that can't be denied. Also I said a few things to raise some questions. One of them being "If I was such a bother to the extent being said that ion the night's in question, how come those nights, not one person exited the theatre in that establishment to complain about me?". Also on another night they filed false complaints against me with that particular theatre, I was never even there. I proved I was elsewhere that night. I also pointed out accounts made to mock me in a cruel manner. Also the claim that was made that I was "I can live tweet if I f**king want to" was proven to not be by me. Apparently Disbarred Attorney and her bunch tried to claim a friend of mine was me. That failed when my friend, whom did make that remake prove we were 2 different people. It also helped that people who knew me stood up for me and my good character. It took a short time to get this dealt with. I go to multiple theatres now. Each one that I go to has been made aware of this failed attempt to get me banned from that one theatre. Also, they've been made aware of their stalking potential, habit of causing trouble. Other places I frequent have also been made aware just in case. Another way Disbarred Attorney, that woman from the UK, and those they've "directed" have tried to interfere in my life is to bother my friends. They've accused one friend of mine of being another all because they're in the same line of work. They've messages friends of mine on Twitter and have accused them of being me for a number of reasons. One of them is hoping they will choose to not be my friend just to avoid their abuse. Another is to get them to think I had to have done something to get them so upset so they start to doubt me and turn against me. Another reason is to make it look like "trouble always follows". One thing the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch loves to do is take something the victim did (that isn't bad) and try to make it look like it was done for some nefarious purpose. This one man was doing some work for charity. Disbarred Attorney and those whom she lied to, attacked this man's good character and accused him falsely of a charity scam. One of the Canadian guys known "WELL" to Disbarred Attorney and the woman from the UK attacked me for a tweet in which I post a short video of people coming out of a movie theatre. That guy said he would disable my phone in a major way. I wasn't focusing on anyone in particular. I was showing that crowds were there for Avengers Infinity War and left the theatre happy with their experience. This man tried to make it look like I was focusing on and were after people's kids. He even went on a mini-tyrade claiming how wrong I was and how whenever I record I should ask permission of everyone in the video. Let's examine this failed logic. When a news caster does a news story at the steps of a courthouse, okay I guess they are in the wrong unless they go to each and every person that the broadcast that passes by. When people go on a trip, they take pictures. So if someone takes a picture of the capital building in Washington DC, they're in the wrong unless they go to every person in the background and ask them if it is okay. This pretty much shows that man was trying to invent reasons to attack me. As he was, Disbarred Attorney, the woman from the UK, and some of their other friends chose to "like" and "retweet" his abusive posts. Even while Disbarred Attorney pretended to be my friend. One of the worst things Disbarred Attorney and her bunch have done is create and manage profiles on twitter made to stir trouble with those who hate the victim to cause them more trouble and to stir trouble for their victims to get them more haters. Often times profiles would "pop up" to attack those who argued or disagreed with them, but mostly when it also happened to someone they wanted to get the blame. It's a pattern of their behavior I recently just picked up on as it has happened quite numerous times. They get bothered. Then I get bothered. THEN they create a profile to poke them. Thus making it seem like I am retaliating. While "some" of my other bullies have created profiles to attack themselves to smear their victims, Disbarred Attorney and her bunch took advantage of this. Things would be twisted to make it seem like they were 100% behind everything so they could get away with anything they pulled. While my bullies are guilty of alot, Disbarred attorney and her bunch tried to add to the mix. Sometimes Disbarred Attorney and her bunch would make random profiles to attack bullies of people they wanted to keep in their fold and use. The purpose of this is to get that person's bullies to attack them all so they can comfort the person just to make it appear as if they are a good friend. Sometimes this is used later on to make it seem like they've done oh so much for the person to guilt them into staying within their fold. Also done to obligate the person into helping them report people they just don't like for whatever petty reason. Often done to those they perceive as a threat to their tactics and way of life. Especially those who dare speak the truth about them. Disbarred Attorney and her bunch have made profiles pretending to be their victims. It's done mostly on Twitter and has even been done on Kik messenger. Not sure which one of them did this, but one of them made a kik messenger profile similar to the one I had at the time. I highly suspect it was either the Disbarred Attorney herself, her friend from the UK, or their friend that's pushing 50 and trolling others for whatever reason he or they want him to. They befriended the woman with the autistic child pretending to be me. It was easy for them to do since she posted her Kik ID on her profile. For the longest time I thought the supposed "suicide threats" the woman with the autistic child posted and claimed I made were false, but they are not. I found out it was someone pretending to be me. Whomever that was got me swatted. So the woman with the autistic child is technically not to blame. The person pretending to be me is. I'm not the only one they've done this to. They've pretended to be others they don't like just to get them fired from a job, evicted from a place, or frighten away their friends. One thing Disbarred Attorney and her bunch hate is when someone they know associates with someone they do not like. When this happens, often times the Disbarred Attorney will have one of her friends message that person or someone known to them asking alot of questions. If no answer is given, they get rather antsy. Especially Disbarred Attorney. She'll get a major attitude. She's done this to me, to my friends, and to countless others. One thing the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch do alot is they will take something said by someone they don't like and find a way to make it about them so as to give them a reason to retaliate in some manner. They tend to do this the most to those who ignore them and live their lives. They try to make it seem like that person is obsessed with them and lives and breathes them. The purpose is to discredit them. They've done this to me many times. All because I chose to walk away from them and not tolerate their abuse. This has been done to others whom have chosen to detach from associating with them. Sometimes to keep the hate going for their victims, the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch will approach someone, on an alternate social profiles, and show them something the victim said while trying to convince them it is about them. This is to get that person to attack their victim so they (Disbarred Attorney and friends) can sit back and watch as they play innocent. In simple terms, have someone do their dirty work for them. The Disbarred Attorney and her bunch have made profiles to cruelly mock others. This has been done to the woman with the autistic child and her child. It's been done to me. It's been done to many others. So many that I have lost count. This is so they can play innocent on their main profiles. The Disbarred Attorney, her male friend that is pushing 50, and their friend from the UK are the worst when it comes to backstabbing people. They will pretend to be someone's friend while trashing them behind their back. They've done it to me by referring to me as crazy and whacky. They've claimed I've said and did things I'd never say and do. They've done this regarding so many people. they've shared parts of conversations to make things look one way. They've even had images photoshopped, mostly by the male friend pushing 50. They've done this to my bullies and others. While my bullies are guilty of ALOT, the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch have used that to make them look worse than they are. Another things this Disbarred Attorney does is when she is mad at someone, she has them doxed as a means of intimidate for whatever purpose. Sometimes it is to keep someone from speaking the truth. Sometimes it is to scare someone off social media because they are afraid of how they'll look for continuously going after them. They go harder after those who ignore them and don't respond to them. They've tried to scare me off. They've failed. The Disbarred Attorney, the woman from the UK, and their male friend pushing 50 are the worst when it comes to poking at their victims by making fun of things and people in their life. They make fun of this one woman and her sisters by making horrible and cruel jokes about weight and special needs. they will stalk her profile and poke fun at things she says to make it seem so totally different. She gets the worst of it and so does the woman with the autistic child. They both get it worse than I do. When the Disbarred Attorney wants to talk to someone and tells them they need to have a chat, she reacts very badly if they don't have that chat or they've the one to have the last word before blocking. She might have others she knows try to talk to the person or go on a tyrade about them by giving them some nickname and ranting in tweets. Sometimes they do this for others reasons. When she goes the tyrade route, always her friend from the UK and the male one pushing 50 participate in some way. They like to subtweet, make crude remark, and stalk . What they mostly do is say something obvious to the victim, but not so obvious to others so that if the victim responds, then hey can use it against them. ALOT of what the Disbarred Attorney told me about others, and told others about others, was a bit exaggerated. Sometimes stuff was "added" into the mix. Mostly to keep people apart and keep them from "talking". This was also done in hopes the person they were talking to would attack whom they are talking about. This way Disbarred Attorney and her bunch could play innocent. Often times they ranted to my now deceased boyfriend in hopes he would help dox and attack. He never did any of those things. All he did was help them report bullies. Rightfully so at the time. But I wonder, how many of those bullies acted the way they did because they were just bad people OR because they were reacting to what the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch had engineered. Coincidentally when Disbarred Attorney gets mad at someone for some reason, things tend to "happen". If someone makes her, her male friend pushing 50, the woman from the UK. or another close friend of theirs mad she (and they) doesn't react well. She and they find a way to attack that person in some form. It could be in a variety of ways.It could range from antagonizing subtweets to push the person to lashing out to finding ways to interfere in their life beyond online. They've done it to me countless times by making false claims, making crude remarks about my deceased boyfriend that dies 2 years ago. They try to be slick about it by mentioning just enough so those they've complained about me to know who they are talking about but wandering eyes don't and will be curious enough to ask. The people who have gotten the worst of this are the woman with the autistic child and this one woman whom they've made fun of and her sisters. The Disbarred Attorney and her bunch have been known to try and catfish their victims. ALOT of the times on Twitter and sometimes on dating sites. I highly suspect that at one point they've made dating profiles pretending to be me . A few times I have been approached by the most piggish people with claims I'm on some dating site and they were just speaking with me about hooking up. I walk away from people like that and don't give them any attention. Most of their catfishing is on Twitter. They might pretend to be some random person to befriend their victim and figure out a way to use whatever they said against them. I've lost count of how many others they've done this too beside me. Alot of the time the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch will excuse their actions by claiming they're "responding in kind" or defending themselves. Because of how they are and all they've done, I've often wondered if with each supposed defense, how much of it was them was intentionally antagonizing the person they supposedly defend themselves against into attacking them. All so they could play victim. Sometimes if the person doesn't bite/fight back, when they do this, they create/invent a reason to "attack back". They try to make it seem like justice and defense. All it is is them excusing their actions. While bullies will be bullies, it does not give them the right to attack back so viciously as they do much of the time. All they prove is they (Disbarred Attorney and her bunch) are the bigger bullies. One thing I have noticed heavily among the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch is they like to give some people the impression they are helping them in order to keep them in their fold and "drinking their koolaid". They might create a profile to mock someone or pretend to be someone in order to attack others. Then on their own profiles they speak out against that profile. They tell the ones affected they'll take care of it. After some times, the one in control of said profile will deactivate it. Voila... it looks like the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch have helped alot right? This is used to make it seem like they are helpful so as to make the person they supposedly helped, feel obligate to help them how they see fit. They also do this in order to look more powerful so when they harass and threaten, it holds more weight. Another thing I've noticed ALOT about the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch is they can't stand those they talk to being friends with those they don't like, liking tweets by those they don't like, retweeting tweets by those they don't like, and associating with those they don't like in some small way. This also goes for friends of those they have in their fold and friends of those they've cast out. If a friend of mine likes a tweet by someone they don't like, they get mad. They might have one of their own message someone known to the person who made the like or Retweet or someone known to a friend of that person. All this is nothing more than an attempt to silence the person. They're hoping the person that they message gets on that person's case and demands they "talk to their friend". This is also another way that they (Disbarred Attorney and her bunch) try to keep more control. they can't stand not being in control of something or someone they want to control. I am the exact opposite of them regarding that. If a friend of mine wants to be friends with someone theta doesn't like me or I don't like, I won't tell them not to or ask them not to. That wouldn't be right to do. People have a right to be friends with whomever they want. for example, I notice some of my friend have tweeted with the woman with the autistic child that use to bully me. That's fine. For those who want to walk away from the Disbarred Attorney and her bunch, things tend to happen to them. Crap is pulled to make them look bad. Their lives beyond the online world are messed with alongside their lives online. Jobs get called. False complaints get filed. Rumors get spread to earn the person more haters. They get stalked and harassed. I can't help but wonder which of my other bullies' actions were partly because of manipulate crap pulled by Disbarred Attorney and her bunch. I have wondered how much less bullying I would have went through if it wasn't for them stirring trouble by pretending to be me while pretending to be my friend. Causing trouble for others and acting like it was at my direction. Attacking others while acting in the way my other bullies have made me look so others would see the problem is me... when it wasn't. The Ones Not Mentioned As it has been noticed by now, I left out ALOT of bullies in this blog. The reason is because this blog is a follow up... an update. The bullies left out are one who have NOT CHANGED for the better or for the worse. That in no way means they don't still bother me. Just means their actions haven't changed. How I feel NOW When it comes to the bullies that have changed for the better, which is only 1, I hope she continues to improve. She has the potential of being a GREAT person. I think the largest part of how she became a certain way is manipulation and bullsh*t from Disbarred Attorney and her bunch. The Disbarred Attorney, the male friend pushing 50, and this woman from the UK are the worst of her bunch. They seem to think it is okay to hurt people. Food for thought They've pulled so much crap that I just stopped caring about what they think. While they may claim to have great lives, how great can they be when they are so horrible to so many just to lift themselves up? Also NO NAMED were mentioned here. Nothing personally identifying. If they see this blog and rant about it, they're only proving one thing. That being they're acknowledging they're the ones that are guilty of a multitude of harassment games and more as described here.
  3. 3 points
    Newark Water Crisis: Racing to Replace Lead Pipes in Under 3 Years 3 years is not good enough. It should be done alot sooner.
  4. 3 points
    Would you rather dress up like a baby when you got out in public for the next week or dress up as a goth for the next 5 family gatherings?
  5. 2 points
    Premiere: Friday September 13, 2019 (8pm-10pm) Network: Lifetime Movie Network IMDB Page: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8537692 Official Movie Site: https://www.mylifetime.com/movies/dating-a-sociopath
  6. 2 points
    Sega Showcases The Upcoming Genesis Mini In New Trailer $80 isn't bad.
  7. 2 points
    Movie Title: "It: Chapter 2" Release Date: September 6, 2019 Movie Website: IMDB Page: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7349950 Feel free to discuss anything, or even post some articles, about the upcoming "It: Chapter 2" movie.
  8. 2 points
  9. 2 points
    I am getting sick and tired of Doctor Becker on Chicago Med. She's way too combative. She doesn't seem like she can stand it when other people are right and she is wrong. She is so self centered!
  10. 2 points
    If they do it right, this could be a world epidemic. Zombie Tidal Wave showed so much potential I swear.
  11. 2 points
  12. 1 point
    Child shot in head by brother in Texas home, sister injured by shrapnel The older teen needs to be investigated regarding this incident. Very closely.
  13. 1 point
    Apple Arcade Price And Release Date Confirmed, And It's Coming Very Soon Offering a trial is a good idea to get a feel for the service.
  14. 1 point
    Two days ago I had a Twitter DM conversation with a man that blocked my friend M---y. I thought it was accidental. It happens. It turned out to be anything but. The entire DM conversation is below. Due to the no "naming and shaming" rule, I have blotched out names, personal photos, and chat identities. I have confirmed with 3 admins that all that is shown below is authentic. I approached this person believing the blocking of my friend @s-----------0 (M---y) was accidental. Then @i--c---------r tells me he received "very very" disturbing message that my friend M---y had written. He says that in them M---y was bullying his friend L---a. I have known M---y for a long time. She is kind, sweet, patient, understanding and would never bully or be hurtful to anyone. This man @i--c---------r is friends with the same people spoken of here: https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/52-my-own-bullying-experience-part-2/, minus the woman with the autistic kid. She has no association with this man or his actions. I knew this and M---y knew this, but she didn't want to judge him based on a few of his friends being bullies. It is obvious who passed on the lied about M----y to him. ================================================ ================================================ It is quite obvious that @i--c---------r chose to believes those lies that were sent to him. Not once did he attempt to try and talk to M---y. Not once did he stop and think about any of the following. 1. All the pleasant interactions he and M---y had. 2. All the nice interactions on M---y's twitter timeline. 3. How respectful and understand M---y has been with him and others. 4. All the attacks on the timelines of those he is friends with that have stalked, harassed, and bullied M---y. @i--c---------r just chose to blindly believe these people who are frequently nasty to others. These same people who will turn against those who won't turn a blind eye and outlive their use. The way @i--c---------r responds to me is very telling. It's a "it's no big deal" impression. Considering the claims he was making, odd isn't it. ================================================ ================================================ I offer @i--c---------r the blog my friend M---y wrote regarding the people that turned against her unjustly and have been bullying, stalking, and harassing her. He, very easily, brushes it off. She never talked about its contents after posting it. Then @i--c---------r claims to have proof M---y was using a parody account to attack and bully others. Not once did @i--c---------r offer up this so called proof he said he had. I made a point to @i--c---------r about @e----m raging about that blog on her Twitter timeline. Considering no names were mentioned in that blog, what does it show besides guilt. ================================================ ================================================ I continue to make my point to @i--c---------r about how these friends of his have abused M---y. I point out he turns a blind eye to attacks on others via their own Twitter timelines. Right after I make my good and valid point, @i--c---------r decides to say he was given the IP address of M---y's computer. I continue to defend her saying she'd never attack anyone. ================================================ ================================================ I continue to defend my friend M---y. This @i--c---------r claims to have "irrefutable proof!". Not once did he offer anything up to prove his claims. He didn't even try to send me what he was sent that made M---y look so bad. He just gets annoyed that I don't sway his way on the claims. To me, this is very fishy. ================================================ ================================================ Here, @i--c---------r acknowledges that M---y had been nice to him. One plus for him. Atleast he acknowledged that. I then tell him that it is possible to forge a computer IP address. People can lie about it. People can photoshop screenshots taken. People can have their friends back up their lies. People can forge the data, pass it off to a few who ask very few questions so they have some back up. Strength in numbers. It seems that @i--c---------r is acknowledging that IP addresses can be forged. Just right after he claims they can't be. Now, which is it? ================================================ ================================================ I make a point to @i--c---------r that he was given false data. I also make a point how M---y is a good person and has shown she's a good person, but he chooses to believe different without questioning it. Then @i--c---------r tries to get the subject changed by saying he had his life hacked, but I chose to stay on topic. But I chose to stay on topic and point out how he is defaming M---y's character. Generally speaking, when someone tries to suddenly change the subject, it is because their BSing is showing, might show, and/or is getting them nowhere. ================================================ ================================================ After my point about how he is defaming M---y's character, @i--c---------r claims he had it researched by a private investigator. I make good points and he is now getting very "cagey" as he makes a bold claim. ================================================ ================================================ Then @i--c---------r says he hired a private investigator with his own money to "check out all these sick people". Wait a minute, I thought he said M---y was responsible. But he hires a PI to check out "all these sick people". Someone's story is changing a little. I point out how his friends target M---y and others and that he turns a blind eye. His response was saying he's not passing on a word of this as if he is doing M---y or me a favor. So, @i--c---------r allegedly hired a PI to check out these messages he was shown. He claims he got M---y's computer IP address from this PI. He says he had this PI "check out these sick people", when he had claimed only M---y before. A PI can't legally obtain a computer's physical address from these claimed messages unless law enforcement or an ISP got involved and obtained it. I guess what I am saying is, @i--c---------r is lying. My guess is he is hoping I will pass on what he said to M----y so she will get scared and slink away from social media, like his bullying friends have been trying to do to her. ================================================ ================================================ I point out, again, to @i--c---------r that he believes lies about M---y, a good person. Then I point out how he says nothing about his friends' attacks on others. Then I point out that he is an accessory to their bullying, threats, and stalking because he sees it and does nothing. Then @i--c---------r gets very defensive acting like I am judging him. All I did was make a few points. Then he says he is a grown man and can do what he wants. So he is saying if he wants to lie, pass on lies, or defame someone that it is okay. ================================================ ================================================ These "friends" of @i--c---------r that I spoke of that have bullied, stalked, and harassed M---y, are the ones blogged about here: https://www.derwillezurmacht.com/blogs/entry/52-my-own-bullying-experience-part-2/ They are that disbarred lawyer and her friends. @i--c---------r has been lied to. He has chosen to run with these lies and blindly believe what he was shown. Based upon his actions and behavior in our conversation, I firmly believe he was lying about hiring a PI. 1. Why would someone be paying alot of money for a PI to get someone's "computer IP address", only to do nothing with it? 2. A PI can't legally obtain someone's physical computer address without involvement of an ISP and/or law enforcement. No ISP or Law Enforcement agency will go about obtaining that information unless a crime has been committed in which they are prosecuting for. 3. Not once was any type of proof offered. 4. First he claims M---y is responsible. Then he says he hired a PI to check out "these sick people", implying more than one. Story change. 5. He tries to get the subject changed as I make valid points. 6. He gets cagey as I make valid points. 7. Showed agitation when I wouldn't sway his way on his defamation about M---y and continued to stand up for her and have her back.
  15. 1 point
    Premiere: Sunday September 15, 2019 (8pm-10pm) Network: Lifetime IMDB Page: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10065726 Official Movie Site: https://www.mylifetime.com/movies/undercover-cheerleader
  16. 1 point
  17. 1 point
    He's got alot of issues that's for sure
  18. 1 point
    He should stay off of all social media until he can behave alot better. Calling women c**ts and twats is kinda nasty and all. He's made violent threats. He's tried turning people against each other.
  19. 1 point
  20. 1 point
    5 years prison time minimum. Full reimbursement to rescue efforts for the pet. $10,000 fine. Court order barring the individual from owning or caring for another pet for the rest of their lives.
  21. 1 point
  22. 1 point
    If you read my blog, "Defamation of Great Character", you'll understand why he's banned and not welcome. In short he attacks people, plays innocent. He lies and tries to cover it. He's made claims in that DM I posted that he contradicted in the attacking posts I deleted. He's a troublemaker that puts on a face of being all about love. But to a few people, he is violent, threatening, and/or nasty.
  23. 1 point
    I think #Optrump is the stupidest OP yet.
  24. 1 point
  25. 1 point
    Premiere: Saturday August 31, 2019 (9pm-11pm) Network: Hallmark Channel IMDB Page: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt10651668 Official Movie Site: https://www.hallmarkchannel.com/my-one-and-only
  26. 1 point
    Dark Crystal Age of Resistance Brings New Trailer And Plot Details To SDCC The series looks good. I see a big deal being made. So I hope there's a chance for a season 2.
  27. 1 point
    Every Friday at 8pm on the Hallmark Channel is a Christmas movie up until 2019's Countdown To Christmas. MORE INFO: https://www.hallmarkchannel.com/christmas/videos/countdown-to-christmas-10th-anniversary-celebration
  28. 1 point
    Walmart removes violent video game displays from its stores. The gun displays will stay. That logic is so flawed and silly. They want to remove display for video games with violence and aggressive behavior out of respect for shooting victims and what happened last weekend, but they keep gun displays. The flawed logic in that is they act like video games are killing people. No no. It is people who don't have the capacity to properly handle a gun...killing people. Pulling violent video games doesn't solve anything. Another flaw in their twisted logic is they say they're pulling the games with violence and aggression...right? Well, why not movies to? You know what? Why not remove pillows from their stores since they've been used to smother people. Let's remove gardening tools too since they can hurt a person. Just about anything anywhere can be used in an act of violence. Doesn't mean we should blame those things. We should blame the people doing the shootings.
  29. 1 point
    Netflix's Witcher Showrunner Lauren Schmidt Hissrich Says They Won't Adapt The Games Too bad because I loved some of the story with the games.
  30. 1 point
  31. 1 point
    Bored trolls who need a job!
  32. 1 point
    I missed the premiere on Saturday, but caught the 2nd showing on Sunday morning at 9am. I enjoyed it very much. The best part, for me, was the electrocution of the zombies in that hallway.
  33. 1 point
    That disbarred lawyer is so many shades of cray cray!
  34. 1 point
    I have my eyes on Simone. Agility is her best friend.
  35. 1 point
  36. 1 point
    2B Black is who I have my eyes on.
  37. 1 point
    This is an issue that has sort of been brewing for some time now and is becoming a problem. So I thought I would create a discussion thread for it.
  38. 1 point
    Rick Snyder and a certain mayor are most responsible.
  39. 1 point
    Event Start: Saturday August 17, 2019 (2:02am ET) Event End: Monday August 19, 2019 (2:00pm ET) Event Details (site): https://www.syfy.com/syfywire/ian-ziering-in-zombie-tidal-wave-syfy-original-movie Event Schedule (all times in Eastern Time) Saturday August 17, 2019 2:02am - 4:00am: "Shark Night" 4:00am - 6:00am: "Toxic Shark" 9:00am - 10:56am: "Dam Sharks" 10:56am - 12:57pm: "Atomic Shark" 12:57pm - 2:58pm: "Zombie Shark" 2:58pm - 5:00pm: "Megalodon" 5:00pm - 7:00pm: "Sharknado" 7:00pm - 9:00pm: "Sharknado 2: The Second One" 9:00pm - 11:00pm: "Zombie Tidal Wave" 11:00pm - 1:00am: "Megalodon" Sunday August 18, 2019 1:00am - 3:00am: "Sharktopus" 3:00am - 5:00am: "Sharktopus Vs Pteracuda" 9:00am - 11:00am: "Zombie Tidal Wave" 11:00am - 1:00pm: "Sharknado" 1:00pm - 3:00pm: "Sharknado 2: The Second One" 3:00am - 5:00pm: "Sharknado 3: Oh Hell No!" 5:00pm - 7:00pm: "Sharknado: The 4th Awakens" 7:00pm - 9:00pm: "Sharknado 5: Global Swarming" 9:00pm - 11:00pm: "The Last Sharknado: It's About Time" 11:00pm - 1:00am: "Frenzy" Monday August 19, 2019 1:00am - 3:00am: "5 Headed Shark Attack" 3:00am - 5:00am: "6-Headed Shark Attack" 10:00am - 12:00pm: "5-Headed Shark Attack" 12:00pm - 2:00pm: "6-Headed Shark Attack"
  40. 1 point
    Dad 'interrogates' daughter's date through doorbell camera That sounds like something my dad would do if he was still alive.
  41. 1 point
    Ian Ziering Faces Off Against the Walking Dead in Syfy's Outrageous 'Zombie Tidal Wave' Movie This should be interesting.
  42. 1 point
    Regardless of those who bear the most responsibility, all who share some should be held accountable.
  43. 1 point
    I can name alot more, but I intend to keep my sanity.
  44. 1 point
    Two faced = no more friendship. Can I be more clear?
  45. 1 point
    I would sit down with this friend and tell them what I notice about their behavior. If they show a desire to change, I will stick by them. If not, then no way!
  46. 1 point
  47. 1 point
  48. 1 point
    Casey, you're being alot kinder than I would have been. I would have had no problem showing that man's name attached to those DMs. But rules are rules here. Got to respect them.
  49. 1 point
    Do any of these people do anything productive online? Trolling, stalking, and harassment doesn't count.
  50. 1 point
    Any person who would participate in such behavior is not someone I would associate with.
This leaderboard is set to New York/GMT-04:00
×
×
  • Create New...